Thursday, September 6, 2007

beer gardens

City commissioners had mixed feelings about approving a beer garden during the Arkalalah festivities.

I did too, but I don't have any problem with it. Mostly because there is a bar open across the street from the chamber during the festival anyway. Secondly, it was only an issue because they wanted to have it outside - which makes it a beer garden. Had they held it indoors, it would have been a state issue and would not have even come before the city commission.

It is true we don't want Arkalalah to become a drunken party. One might argue that this is the first step toward that, but still, its a long way to that point.

It could set a precedent, and clear the way for every other group that exists to have an outdoor beer party at a city park.
They were careful to word the ordinance so that it only applies to arkalalah.

So it will probably be fine.

If it gets to be a problem, they can pass an ordinance to fix it easily enough.

At least they are trying something, and the city is allowing them to try something.

I don't know how the public will react. I have one letter already against it, so it will be interesting.

But remember, this is the Chamber of Commerce. it isn't the gay hell's angel dope smoker's annual reunion. So we need to keep it in context.

They had a beer and brats thing last year, where they served beer indoors. And at sometime recently there was a wine and cheese event at the Burford i believe. Neither of which caused any problems.

Im just glad someone is trying something.

j

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

James,

It is not true that the Commission was only involved because it was outside. The city commission was involved because the sponsors of the event wanted to have it on city property.

If it were not for asking to use city property the city commissioners would not have been involved at all.