Tuesday, November 25, 2008

school board meeting

Here is our story today

By FOSS FARRAR
Staff Writer

School district officials and administrators of Arkansas City High
School addressed the issues of fighting and rumors of violence Monday
night at a meeting of the Arkansas City Board of Education held at the
high school.
The issue of school safety was not originally on the agenda, but was
taken up after several fighting incidents and the spreading of a rumor
of a shooting have occurred in recent weeks.
"I expected that when we had the floor (for Monday's meeting) we would
be celebrating and talking about our (Breakthrough Schools) award,"
said ACHS Principal Marci Shearon.
She told the board that although school safety is a priority and a
small number of students had recently been involved in fighting
incidents, the student body had achieved great things in art, music
and academics.
"The kids bring you joy every day," Shearon said.
Arkansas City Public Schools Superintendent Ron Ballard told the board
and about 25 people attending the meeting that the school was planning
to put more staff members around the school and its parking lot before
and after school to prevent further incidents.
Ballard said video surveillance equipment that had been planned for
the school in a recently adopted $35.8 million bond issue would go to
the top of the list of projects to be completed.
One of the parents attending the meeting was Arkansas City Police
Chief Sean Wallace
.
"If I were to give a status of how the school is, I'd say it's
completely safe," Wallace said today.
Those who attended the meeting included high school teachers and
parents of students involved in several fighting and bullying
incidents that have occurred recently and in years past.
Parents were given an opportunity to address the board, but nobody did
so.
Wallace said he attended the meeting to show support to the school
administration.
The chief said he has put four sons through ACHS and none have been
involved in a physical fight. "I think (reports of violent incidents)
have been blown out of proportion."
School officials told the board that they acted appropriately — and a
board member and police officials agreed — to ensure no violent
incident would occur after a rumor spread by text messaging among
students that a shooting would occur on a recent Friday.
But the rumor kept about 50 percent of the student body from attending
classes that day, according to the high school principal, Marci Shearon.
"Technology has bypassed the capacity of schools to respond with
fact," said Arkansas City Public Schools Superintendent Ron Ballard.
Wallace noted today that any communication such as texting done with
the intent to terrorize or evacuate a building is a felony.
"We need to take serious the text messaging," Wallace said.
Asked by a board member what she might have done differently after
rumors of the shooting spread on a recent Thursday, Shearon said she
would take a look at how the school communicates with parents.
"The cell-phone usage and the rate with which the rumor spread
surprised me," she said. "How fast or how horribly the rumor mill
spread would be something we should re-evaluate. Communication is
something that has to be essential."
Shearon said dealing with rumors was a discussion point among the 16
members of the high school site council. They include parents and
members of the community as well as teachers.
"At the site council Thursday we talked about rumors," she said. "We
knew about (the shooting rumor) but didn't know about it until 9:30
that night."
Another parent at the meeting, Kechia Reese — whose husband Daren is a
school board member — said her kids knew about the rumor much earlier
that day, at about 3:30 p.m.
Ballard addressed the communication issue:
"Why did the school district not put out a message to parents that
these were false rumors?" Ballard asked rhetorically. "Because we did
not know they were false at that point."
The Monday after the rumors spread, students were back in school, but
another fight occurred after school. It resulted in school board
member Daren Reese taking his children out of school.
Despite the recent fighting, police and school officials say that
overall fighting incidents have decreased over the past few years.
Wallace said over the past four years, fighting at the high school has
decreased more than 50 percent.
Assistant Principal Will Pfannenstiel presented discipline statistics:
Sixty-two students so far this year have received out-of-school
suspensions compared to 89 a year ago. Physical fights have involved
19 students, an increase of two compared to last spring. There were 18
such incidents last fall.
"The biggest issue is inappropriate items because of cell phones,"
Pfannenstiel said. "We have had 127 cell-phone infractions so far.
Those numbers are the fastest-growing category of discipline."

23 comments:

Anonymous said...

??? Hummm....they didn't know the rumors were false but still didn't say anythign to parents. So did that mean they thought there was a threat and still choose NOT to let parents know. That's pathetic. So they put up more security cameras. Do they think that'll stop anything? NO....cameras will not stop anything.

I don't think there is a simple solution BUT putting up cameras is not the solution. Wow! USD 470 you amaze me.

Anonymous said...

"Whitewash" The Board, Superintendant and Prinicpal, just do not get it.....

Anonymous said...

I just read the board briefs on the district website. NOT ONE SINGLE WORD mentioned the safety discussions. I guess we wouldn't want visitors to see there are issues that are less than flattering. USD 470 you are again sticking your head in the sand and being honest with people!!

Anonymous said...

I think that the video camera system CAN be a deterrent from violence IF, and only if, it is able to identify an offender, and that offender is punished to the full extent. If they coddle the little turds, then expect nothing to change.

Anonymous said...

On the surface, 19 fights this fall does not look like a huge number, however, if you projectthose numbers out through the end of the school year, you come up with roughly 15 fights per 100 students. Again, more than 10 times the state average which was 1.38 per 100 in the 2004-2005 school year.
Also, they reported only 5 incidents of bullying.
Anyone with any common sense knows that is not true. The real question to ask is why is it going unreported?

Anonymous said...

"On the surface, 19 fights this fall does not look like a huge number, however, if you projectthose numbers out through the end of the school year, you come up with roughly 15 fights per 100 students. Again, more than 10 times the state average which was 1.38 per 100 in the 2004-2005 school year."

First off, he said 19 students were involved in fights so far in the fall semester not 19 fights. If you assume they were each 2 people fights and it obviously isn't always the case then that would be 9.5 fights already for the entire fall semester. And 9 fights for the spring semester so based on per 100 students you are looking at 1.15 fights per 100 students already for the fall semester.

If you want to look at # of students involved in fights per 100than that would be roughly 2.3 students per 100.

If he misspoke and it was 19 fights for the fall semester than it would still only be 2.3 fights per 100 students so far this fall. The number of students involved would be higher.

To get to your 15 fights per 100 students there would have to be 123fights this year, which is 15*8.26since there were 826 students enrolled in ACHS for the 2008-2009 school year.

Anonymous said...

"First off, he said 19 students were involved in fights so far in the fall semester not 19 fights"

If it takes a day and a half for a chicken and a half to lay an egg and a half, then:

19 students fighting over 60 days equals how many students fighting over the whole year?

Duh... still 19.

The same 19.

Punish them and you will cure the problem.

Anonymous said...

Actually, at 60 fights for the year, it would be more than 7 per 100. You are correct, my math was horribly wrong. Also, you are correct that both barties are not commiting a violent act, so lets say it is half, or 3.5 per 100. Further, not every violent act involves a fight. So the number is probably higher, but certainly nowhere near the 15 I had figured earlier. My apologies, I certainly don't wan't to exaggerate, or make false accusations...

Anonymous said...

The same 19.

Punish them and you will cure the problem.


punishing the 19 or 38 particpants in the fights is fine but there will be another 19 or 38 more yo take there place , just like what is done with the leaders at the secondary educational level. What we need to run the school's are some more Jerry Hollis type people not the Sara Palin type

Anonymous said...

This is a school and even one fight is one too many. I am a former high school teacher and one fight can disrupt an entire day of learning for an entire school. It is not about the number of fights it is just about the fact that we have fights.

I understand that fights are part of the culture of being a teenager but these fights seem to be more serious than others.

I am more concerned by the fact that many teachers and parents are afraid to speak out. There are many things being said but not to administrators. They can not address the problem if they don't know about it but yet why don't parents tell them about the things going on that they know about.

I also find it shocking that the administration did not know about the bomb threat until 9:30 p.m. when I knew about it by 4 and I don't even have a kid in school. Perhaps, I should have called the school but perhaps they should have been listening more intently to what was going on in front of them.

Earlier that week there were four fights and five kids were suspended. Teachers were hurt but claim they were just sore...is that okay?

There is something wrong with the picture and I blame both sides but it is the job of the administration both at the high school and at the district level to tell us the truth.

Are the statistics really telliing the truth or have fewer kids been disciplined for issues that would have normally resulted in suspension. Are we not discipling to coddle kids into staying in school and winning awards for better graduation rates and attendance?

Facts mean nothing if the underlying fact is that kids are afraid, staff is afraid and the upper authorities are not listening.

Anonymous said...

Dab Gummit, En'ma day we youngins' all carried muskets ta schewl.

Had a need for'em against da local injuns. Why me and ma ol'musket Betsy saw many ah scrape but we never did wimper a sound.

Youngins these a days need to toughen up, become men. I went with no shoes all thru schewl. Winter time my Ma would wrap barbed wire aroun' are feet for traction in the snow. An' we ah liked it...

Anonymous said...

Where is your Superman now?

Anonymous said...

"just read the board briefs on the district website. NOT ONE SINGLE WORD mentioned the safety discussions. I guess we wouldn't want visitors to see there are issues that are less than flattering. USD 470 you are again sticking your head in the sand and being honest with people!!"

I just checked the BOE briefs too... none have been posted yet for Monday night's meeting. That's probably why it doesn't mention anything about safety talks.

Anonymous said...

What we need is kids to learn to fight better. When I was growing up we had golden gloves. If kids could challenge each other to formal duels after school in a refereed ring atmosphere we could provide a way for them to get out some of their angst and they would learn discipline and get in shape and we might have another sports program we could be proud of.

Anonymous said...

What we need is kids to learn to fight better. When I was growing up we had golden gloves. If kids could challenge each other to formal duels after school in a refereed ring atmosphere we could provide a way for them to get out some of their angst and they would learn discipline and get in shape and we might have another sports program we could be proud of.

Anonymous said...

""Technology has bypassed the capacity of schools to respond with
fact," said Arkansas City Public Schools Superintendent Ron Ballard."

Dear Ron Ballard & USD 470 Boardmembers:

It seems to me the soultion is simple...control the technology for your own use. Send out a text message to everyone that signs up and wants to receive a daily, weekly or "Emergency" text about the school and/or functions. Cost to do this would be minimal to say the least.

This makes me wonder how the school teaches our students, when the administration and school board refuse to get on board with current technology?

I am disappointed with the current actions of the board, but it is a very curable problem that needs to be addressed.

My other concern is the fact we voted the new bond issue to enhance security, but the only actions taken seem to be stalling out the tennis court, putting in a septic tank and deciding we need to raise the sales tax to make the roads nicer to the new football stadium.

We need to make the students safety the first priority, not somewhere after the football field, tennis court and every other fool thing that seems to come along.

Thank you,

Darrin

Anonymous said...

"but there will be another 19 or 38 more yo take there place"

Really?

Once you deal with a few, then others replace them?

Nope. It doesn't work that way.

There are just a few juvenile delinquents that are giving Ark City a bad name.

They are being ignored and doing it over and over again. Most of the kids are good kids.

If you don't deal with it it will just get worse.

Anonymous said...

This makes me wonder how the school teaches our students, when the administration and school board refuse to get on board with current technology?

I had this same thought. The educators need to update themselves on new technology. The students should be learning this from us, not us from them. Technology education is going to be a must for young adults entering the workplace. It should be a slap in the face that they are already one up on those who are supposed to be teaching them.

Anonymous said...

Of course Marci Shearon wanted more pats on the back but wanted to shove the ugly under the rug- so typical of her behavior. This entire story is reflective of James and others self rightous, self important attitudes. None of you have your head where it needs to be instead it is so far up your own asses you cant see daylight. Cell phone infractions...good lord!!! WHY DON'T YOU TRY DEALING WITH THE TROUBLE MAKERS AND BULLYS INSTEAD OF PATTING YOURSELF ON THE BACK AND WORRYING ABOUT CELL PHONES???? PRIORITIES PEOPLE!!!!

Anonymous said...

My kids have told me that they have been bullied. They also said that if they even so much as defend themseleves against an attack, that they will be suspended. My response was this: If someone swings on you, DO YOUR BEST TO BEAT THE LIVING HELL OUT OF THEM! We will deal with any suspension that comes along. But send a message to the bully that you will not be a victim.

Good advise? Maybe not for some, but for my kids I think it is. One incident of suspension is better than a whole high school experience of being bullied.

Anonymous said...

@11:39 AM plus once you get your lights punched out, you learn who not to pick on.

Anonymous said...

Cell phones are the fastest growing form of discipline... So that is why you can't keep my kids safe- you're on cell phone patrol instead of actually doing anything. Typical. The school is run by some real jackasses. I wish the people who have their heads you know where were the ones being bullied- then maybe they would give a shit.

Anonymous said...

Well as lobg as school vouchers are never allowed, then the USD 470 commie comandos can keep spending on everything but safety, and make damn sure Mr. Ballard makes over 100,000 a year, for doing nothing